I hope to post three types of essays. Each with varying levels of truthiness.
1) If I post any original reports and pics it's basically my own personal musings and recollections. I do not want you to believe a single word of it or quote it as any sort of definitive reference. It's not that I am lying about anything it's just that if I inadvertently mention anything that is NOT open source I don't want folks to pull me up for it. There is so much information floating around that I can barely keep all of it straight.
This is not my vocation but an avocation and I am very grateful that some folks (who actually do this sort of stuff for a living) trusted me enough to let me get close to some very cool stuff.
2) But thats about the original reports, when it comes to my incisive comments about strategery stuff you WILL accept every word I type. After all my blog is as reliable and has the same specious resources (google) as the next guy pretending to be some sort of a pundit or punditz to be precise.
3) Finally there is my insightful conspiracy theory/original thought (a.k.a Original Malice) stuff. This is based on hammering together absolutely unrelated stories to create something that would officially be a work of fiction. Should you accept it? If you believe that the Arjun can fly then yes please do.
PS: The Arjun does fly no one believes me.
PPS: I am an accidental/occasional blogger so even if you leave comments I may not read them. I have been informed that bloggers love the comments folks leave for them, but Tactical Malice is just too full of itself to really care about comments.
Saturday, April 26, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)